Linux already runs X11, so it would have no control over that either like Wineskin does. and make Wine portable with executables to run everything. it wouldn't be like a single "application" as much, but its entirely possible for anyone to do that. It would just be an executable file for launching along with a folder with all the Wine contents and a folder for the prefix. If I tried to make a version for Linux, it would be a major re-write, and it wouldn't be very worthwhile, as it doesn't use bundles. Wineskin uses this to make app bundles like this tha are real mac apps, with all the libraries (Wine, X11 and such) all inside the app as well, including the wineprefix and everything needed. When you look in Finder and see something like MyProgram.app which you double click to run, its not really a file like it looks like, but a folder.
Mac OS X has "bundles" which are different to most other OSes. So, basically, the bully wrapper could be an hard patched wine? Doh123 wrote:I simply try to make Wineskin a good tool with tons of customization options to get programs working.
0 kommentar(er)
